Access

Open Access

Date Range

1972-1978

Description

This collection includes:

  • Letter to Harcourt asking for comments on a paper Shaikh was submitting to The Review of Economics and Statistics (May 31, 1972)

  • Letter from Harcourt discussing Shaikh’s paper and mentioning his book The Cambridge Controversies (July 20, 1972)

  • Letter to Harcourt thanking him for his comments on Shaikh’s paper (October 11, 1972)

  • Letter requesting a copy of Shaikh’s Transformation paper (May 31, 1973)

  • Letter from Harcourt stating that with some editing, Shaikh’s paper would be published in Australian Economic Papers (May 14, 1974)

  • Letter from Harcourt announcing that Australian Economic Papers had received Shaikh’s article “The So-Called ‘Transformation Problem’: Marx Vindicated” (May 15, 1974)

  • Letter from Harcourt thanking Shaikh for sending his dissertation (June 19, 1974)

  • Letter from Harcourt discussing one of Shaikh’s papers and asking him to extrapolate on some points (February 28, 1975)

  • Letter to Harcourt discussing the possibility of writing a book on the theory of value (July 14, 1976)

  • Letter from Harcourt discussing Shaikh’s paper on international values and mentioning a paper on Marx and joint production (August 6, 1976)

  • Letter from Harcourt discussing a review in New Statesman and reporting positive feedback on Shaikh’s visit to Cambridge (January 27, 1978)

  • Letter to Harcourt discussing Harcourt’s review of Steedman’s book (April 27, 1978)

  • Letter from Harcourt regarding Shaikh’s remarks (May 17, 1978)

  • Letter to Harcourt explaining that Shaikh’s review comments sounded harsher than intended (June 1, 1978)

  • Letter from Harcourt noting that a co-author agrees with Shaikh’s comments on Steedman’s book (June 15, 1978)

  • Letter from Harcourt to Ian Steedman and S. Metcalfe discussing Piero’s interpretation, Wilfred Salter, and Joan’s investment and scrapping requirements (November 22, 1978)

  • Letter from Edward J. Nell discussing the Simon-Levy paper, Walters, and Bronfenbrenner’s Income Distribution Theory, and suggesting Shaikh send a copy of his CV (March 1, 1972)

  • Letter to the editor of The Review of Economics and Statistics submitting a paper for consideration (May 30, 1972)

  • Letter from the editor of The Review of Economics and Statistics confirming receipt of a manuscript and requesting additional copies to speed review (June 1, 1972)

  • Letter to the editor of The Review of Economics and Statistics enclosing additional copies of a paper (June 5, 1972)

  • Letter from Scott Koss requesting a copy of the Humbug Production Function paper and mentioning Joan Robinson’s praise (September 13, 1972)

  • Letter to the editor of The Review of Economics and Statistics inquiring about the status of a paper (October 11, 1972)

  • Letter to Professor Hendrik S. Houthakker, editor of The Review of Economics and Statistics, enclosing a shortened revised edition of a paper (October 30, 1972)

  • Letter from the editor of The Review of Economics and Statistics acknowledging receipt of a manuscript (November 1, 1972)

  • Letter from Franklin M. Fisher discussing aggregate production functions, capital stocks, and labor (November 8, 1972)

  • Letter from Scott discussing Cobb-Douglas functions, econometrics, and a trip to the U.S. (November 14, 1972)

  • Letter to the editor of The Review of Economics and Statistics inquiring about the current status of a paper (February 22, 1973)

  • Letter from Hendrik S. Houthakker stating that The Review of Economics and Statistics accepted Shaikh’s paper “Law of Production and Laws of Algebra” (March 8, 1973)

  • Letter from Ian Steedman requesting a copy of Shaikh’s paper “Laws of Production and Laws of Algebra” (March 14, 1973)

  • Letter from B. C. Chakrabarti requesting reprints of Shaikh’s articles (March 16, 1973)

  • Letter from Leeroy Murray, final-year student at Middlesex Polytechnic, requesting a copy of Shaikh’s article on the Humbug Production Function (March 30, 1973)

  • Letter from Ian Steedman thanking Shaikh for his paper and mentioning Henryk Grossman (April 12, 1973)

  • Letter from Harcourt thanking Shaikh for his letter and paper, discussing the Humbug paper, and suggesting other possible journals for publication (June 6, 1973)

  • Letter from Leeroy Murray thanking Shaikh for forwarding his article and discussing his final-year exams and B.A. Social Science degree (October 3, 1973)

  • Letter from Luigi Pasinetti thanking Shaikh for his article and discussing Robert Solow’s comment (June 12, 1974)

  • Letter from Joan Robinson discussing the publication of Shaikh’s article, noting the missed opportunity to comment on Solow’s reply, and a possible book collaboration with Schefold (June 21, 1974)

  • Letter to Hendrik S. Houthakker, editor of The Review of Economics and Statistics, discussing Solow’s comment on Shaikh’s article and requesting the right to reply in the next issue (June 28, 1974)

  • Letter from Houthakker explaining the journal’s policy to terminate a discussion after the first rebuttal and clarifying that Shaikh’s article was seen as a critique of Solow (July 1, 1974)

  • Letter from Harcourt discussing Shaikh’s comments on Solow and noting that Shaikh need not do much work to make his dissertation publishable (August 13, 1974)

  • Letter from Harcourt discussing Shaikh’s previous version of a paper and mentioning a possible visit to NYC after the International Economic Association (IEA) Conference in Spain (February 11, 1975)

  • Letter from Harcourt discussing Shaikh’s recent paper and mentioning Ed Nell, Rosalind Seneca, and Tom Cooley (February 14, 1975)

  • Letter from Harcourt discussing Australian Economic Papers publishing Shaikh and criticizing Houthakker’s and Solow’s treatment of Shaikh (March 5, 1975)

Download

Included in

Economics Commons

Share

COinS