"Correspondence - Manila" by Anwar Shaikh PhD
 

Access

Open Access

Description

This folder begins with a letter from Edward Tower at Duke asking for Prof. Shaikh to share his reading lists (4/5/80), Shaikh’s comments as a referee on Duncan Foley’s paper, “On the transformation of surplus value into profit,” (5/19/80), a letter from Erik Wright about Wright’s essay on the labor theory of value (u.d.), a note from Shaikh to Professor Van Ness saying that owing to work he would not be able to be at the June conference in Denver (6/1/79), a note from Van Ness asking Shaikh to submit a paper to said conference (5/21/79), a letter from Shaikh to E. Tijerina saying that Shaikh would be out of NYC for 15-months but encouraging Tijerina to see about being a scholar at the New School (6/1/79), the initial letter from Tijerina about possibly meeting with Shaikh in NY (5/8/79), letters between Shaikh and Professor Weiss-Altaner regarding some papers that Weiss-Altaner had requested of Shaikh (6/1/79 & 5/15/79), letters between Shaikh and Jo Bradley of the Cambridge Journal of Economics about some papers Shaikh recommended for publication and also comments the Journal had received regarding Shaikh’s paper (6/1/79 &4/17/79), letters between Shaikh and Michael Perelman about Shaikh’s work on the falling rate of profit (6/1/79 & u.d.), a letter to Margaret Fay lauding her paper on joint production (6/4/79), and a copy of a note from Fay about Unterbrunn’s refutation of Steedman (11/20/78), letters between Shaikh and Anton Leist about a new journal proposal ((6/4/79 & 5/6/79), a letter to Pablo Ruiz-Napoles regarding Shaikh teaching a semester at UNAM (6/1/79), a letter to Robert Fitch with advice about a paper he was writing 5/21/79), a letter to Professor Sam Aaronovitch about the possibility of Aaronovitch writing a book for Macmillan(u.d.), a letter to Shaikh from David Jaffe referencing the “transformation problem” (3/15/79), a letter from a Polish control engineer also discussing the transformation problem (1/5/79), a paper on the “immiseration” (sic) thesis with handwritten notes (8/14/78), a letter from Professor Shaikh to Professor Robert Gordon with questions about Gordon’s views on capital stock data and its derivations (4/6/79), a letter from Paddy Quick to Gita Sen about Quick’s joining the faculty of the New School on a part-time basis that Shaikh was copied on (4/13/79), the handwritten letter to Quick from Constance Blake that is referred to in the letter to Sen (u.d.), a letter to A. Shaikh from Angelo Reati requesting Shaikh to send the writer the final version of an article (3/28/79), along with Shaikh’s reply to him (4/4/79), a letter from Shaikh to Professor O’Hair in South Australia agreeing to look over Chris Starr’s thesis along with the original letter about this to Shaikh(4/4/79 & 3/23/79), an invitation from Anwar Shaikh to Mr. S. Toh at the University of Alberta inviting him to a conference (3/28/79), a letter from Shaikh to Mr. Ruiz Napoles telling him that Shaikh would be in Mexico that summer (3/28/79), two letters to Faycal Yachir in Algiers inviting him to present at the URPE Conference on the Third World (3/28/79), and a copy of the cable sent to Yachir inviting him to present his paper on Finance Capital (u.d.); a brief note from Jo Bradley at Cambridge asking about Shaikh’s introductory piece (2/9/79); a letter to Arjo Klamar & Janet Seis at the Economics Department, Duke University, regarding Shaikh’s views on the Marxist analysis of the labor theory of value and how to get a book on philosophy and a critique of social theory (2/16/79); a letter to John Blackburn, Chair of Economics at Duke, about reimbursement for Shaikh’s airfare (3/2/79); an interoffice memo from Shaikh to the Department at the New School requesting a leave (3/7/79); a Cambridge Journal of Economics Referee Report filled out by Shaikh recommending rejection of a paper on the distribution of labor 5/1/80); a letter to Shaikh from Colin Day, Editor at the US office of Cambridge University Press regarding Shaikh giving the journal “Science and Society” permission to print material that was under copyright to CUP (5/9/80); a note from Bertha Heatley, Circulation Department at the Library of the University of California, Riverside, apologizing for billing him for books he had not checked out 95/2/80); a handwritten note from John Marinelli, then a graduate student at SUNY Buffalo, requesting reading lists from Shaikh (3/26/80); a letter to George Liodakis approving a proposal Liodakis had written along with a handwritten note from Liodakis he had sent with the proposal (3/7/79 & 2/3/79); a brief note to Jo Bradley, Cambridge Journal of Economics, regarding his responses to letters regarding his published paper (3/6/79); a letter to Shaikh from H.J. Buchan, Registrar, Flinders University, asking Shaikh to be one of the examiners on Christopher Starrs PhD thesis (2/27/79), along with this is the official guidelines governing the procedure; a letter from J.C.R. Rowley at McGill University thanking Shaikh for his letter and CV (2/16/79); a letter from Arjo Klamar & Janet Seiz at Duke telling him about the conversations his paper inspired (2/25/79); a letter from Mike Bleaney at the University of Nottingham regarding his differences with Shaikh, especially on interpreting Marx’s statement on competition cheapening prices (11/23/78); a letter from Shaikh to Don Shakow at Clark University regarding expenses for their joint project (2/1/79); a letter from Shaikh to Jo Bradley (CJE) about the difficulties of writing an introduction when he had not yet had time to read all the articles (2/15/79) ; an overview of Marxist economic literature written by Laurence Harris and Ben Fine, from Shaikh and sent to Prof. A. G. Hines, Birkbeck College, University of London (2/14/79) in response to the letter from Hines asking for the review (12/15/78); a letter from Shaikh to Starrs regarding an anti-Samuelson economics text (2/13/79), along with a handwritten note from Starrs to Shaikh (1/14/79); a brief note from Shaikh to J.C.R. Rowley to accompany his CV and papers, (2/12/79) (see above); a letter to George Wright from Shaikh welcoming him to the URPE Third World Caucus (2/2/79); the letter from J.C. R. Rowley to Shaikh requesting his information (1/26/79) (see above); a handwritten and somewhat water-smudged letter from George Wright to Shaikh about his interest in Third World economics1/20/79); another letter from Shaikh to Jo Bradley (CJE) about responding to comments on his paper (2/9/79); Shaikh’s letter to Martin Landsberg with a flier on the URPE Conference (1/18/79); a letter to Nakatani Takeshi apologizing for not responding to him sooner but explaining why he had lost Nakatani’s original note (1/18/79), along with Bradley’s note about Nakatani’s wondering why he had not received an answer as well as what Nakatani sent to the CJE (1/8/79); similarly, a letter from Professor Hilde Bojer, University of Oslo, and Shaikh’s note back explaining the freak accident that had led to his losing the original correspondence (1/18/79 & 12/22/78); letters to and from Shaikh and Professor Satish Raichur about Shaikh’s possibly giving a paper at the University of Denver (1/18/79 & 1/5/79); a letter from Shaikh to Professor Janet Seiz at Duke referring her to an URPE conference coming up on the Soviet Union (1/17/79); an exchange of letters between Shaikh and Jay M. Gould, President of Economic Information Systems, regarding the purchase of data by Shaikh from Gould (1/16/79 & 1/10/79); a letter from Martin Landsberg at Lewis and Clark to Shaikh about the importance of URPE being at upcoming conferences (12/31/78); a letter from Steve Fraser, Editor at the American Branch of Cambridge University Press, about several needed editorial changes to Shaikh’s article as recommended by the legal department (11/9/78); a brief note from Rick Seltzer at Howard asking for copies of the paper “Marxian Theory and Empirical Evidence” that Shaikh had given at the URPE summer conference 11/8/78); a handwritten note from Roger Odisio to Shaikh asking if he had done any further work on the secular movement of Marxist categories 11/10/78); a letter from Jerry Sazama, University of Connecticut, asking for copies of two of Shaikh’s papers (9/5/78); a note from Barry Bluestone, Boston College, requesting a copy of the paper, “A Marxist Reconstruction of National Income Accounts” (9/11/78); two notes from Robert Heilbroner, one to Sheila Gate that Shaikh has a copy of reminding her of the “10-year rule,” (1/8/79) and the other reminding all faculty of the department’s policies (1/3/78); a letter and business card from Josep Vegara i Carrio saying that he had missed seeing Shaikh while in NYC but would like to receive the reading list for his seminar on the labor theory of value (9/5/75); a letter to Jo Bradley, Managing Editor CJE saying that he, Shaikh, did not believe himself to be the best person to review Rankin’s paper on supply and demand in the Ricardian price theory,(12/20/78) along with Ms Bradley’s note asking him to look at it (11/6/78); another letter from Bradley about a letter to Shaikh about his article in the Dobb’s issue (11/3/78); a letter from Shaikh to Duncan Foley regarding defending his article in the Dobb’s issue and discussing in general the role of mathematics in Marxist economics (11/20/78), sent in reply to Foley’s letter to Shaikh with which he enclosed an article he had written about money (11/10/78); and lastly a letter from Shaikh to Donald Cole, Drew University, recommending Bobby Guttmann for a position there (11/20/78).

Included in

Economics Commons

Share

COinS